Developed by William of Occam in 14th century England, Occam's razor reads
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem, or in near literal translation
entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity. The principle can be more popularly stated as "
when you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better." How does this apply to investing? Let's attempt to formulate an investment portfolio that provides maximum diversity and covers the major classes of investments in the simplest way. Asset classes I'm interested in include large, mid and small cap domestic stocks, large, mid and small cap foreign stocks, emerging markets, domestic bonds, and foreign bonds. It includes a classic 60/40 split between stocks and bonds, and a 60/40 split between domestic and international.
My sample portfolio looks like:
Fund Name
| Symbol
| Asset Class
| Target
|
Vanguard Total Stock Market
| VTI
| LCB
| 36.00%
|
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US
| EUV
| INT'L LCB
| 24.00%
|
Vanguard Intermediate Bond Market
| BIV
| INTER BOND
| 24.00%
|
iShares S&P International Treasury Bond Fund
| IGOV
| INT'L BOND
| 16.00%
|
This simple portfolio is merely an example, not a recommendation, but illustrates how easy it is to achieve diversity by investing in worldwide economic growth, hedging currency risk, individual security risk and individual country risk. Each individual will have to determine the optimum mix of assets for their portfolio. But the simpler the portfolio, the more likely to investor is to stick with the investment program through both good and bad times.
No comments:
Post a Comment